About
Built for the analyst whose conclusions have to hold up.
Krataxis is a deliberate alternative to the newsreader. An opinionated platform with one job: turn the open web into evidence you can defend in front of a peer review.
Mission
Cut through the noise. Surface defensible ground truth.
In contested information environments, every party shapes the picture in its favour. Disinformation is deployed deliberately, and independent verification is a specialist skill most organisations don't have on staff. The problem isn't shortage — it's an unmanageable excess of competing claims, none arriving with a reliable credibility signal.
Krataxis answers that problem systematically. Aggregate intelligence across the open web; weight each item by source, actor, and geography; assign it to persistent actor profiles; and surface a corroborated picture inside structured Battlespaces.
The result is a workflow where conclusions are not opinions — they're supported by a queryable body of evidence you can publish, audit, or challenge on its merits.
Founding principle
“No single source is authoritative. Corroboration across independent, unaffiliated sources — combined with known actor behaviour over time — is the only path to defensible ground truth.”
— Krataxis design principle
What makes us different
A structured workstation. Not a feed reader.
Krataxis operates simultaneously at three levels — tactical, operational, strategic — without making you context-switch.
T
Tactical
Individual incidents — who claimed what, when, from which source, at what confidence.
O
Operational
Actor profiles and pattern-of-life records that accumulate across incidents over time.
S
Strategic
Trend indicators and predictive signals — where the situation is heading.
Why this matters in practice
A journalist with five independent sources, a consistent actor credibility record, and confirmed incident locations is in a stronger editorial position than one citing "multiple reports suggest." A corporate security team that presents a structured, evidenced risk picture carries far more authority than one summarising from memory. A defence analyst who anchors assessments to a documented chain of corroborated intelligence makes more defensible decisions under pressure. Krataxis exists to put every professional in the stronger position.
Principles
Six principles behind every design decision.
01
No source is sufficient alone
Every item is provisional until corroborated by independent, unaffiliated sources. Any single source may be wrong, biased, or deliberately misleading — convergence across multiple independent sources is what approaches reliability.
02
Credibility is earned, not assumed
Source credibility ratings are continuously revised. When a source's claims are confirmed, its rating rises; when refuted, it falls. The platform learns from your analysis over time.
03
Geography is evidence
Location is analytical information, not metadata. A claim inconsistent with the actor's known area of operation carries less weight than one that aligns.
04
Conclusions must be auditable
Every conclusion is only as strong as its evidence. Krataxis preserves a structured record of every source, corroboration, actor assignment, and escalation decision — so conclusions can be defended, not just recalled.
05
The analyst is always in control
Automation handles collection, scoring, and correlation. No item becomes a confirmed event without a deliberate analyst decision. Krataxis augments judgement; it doesn't replace it.
06
Actors drive the picture
Incidents without actor context are data. Incidents assigned to persistent profiles with historical records, credibility ratings, and behaviour patterns become intelligence.
It's For
Built for the working professional — not the consortium.
Independent analysts, in-house security teams, research organisations, journalists, and academics. Krataxis is deliberately accessible to the practitioner who can't sign a five-figure SaaS contract.
Independent OSINT analysts
Conflict, geopolitical, and security analysts working solo or in small teams.
Security & risk teams
Corporate security, threat intel, and risk teams briefing executives weekly.
Research organisations
Think tanks, NGOs, and academic institutions tracking situations over time.
Journalists & editorial
Reporters needing a defensible evidence chain behind a contested claim.
Disaster-response staff
Operations teams correlating reports across reliefweb, ACLED, and weather feeds.
Defence & intel analysts
Working at the unclassified layer with structured, citable output.
Free beta · Permanent free tier
Try it on your work. Form your own view.
Full platform access. Connect your sources in minutes.