KRATAXIS Docs
Search the documentation… ⌘K Back to site ↗
Knowledge Base / Investigations / Investigations — Working a Question to a Finding

Investigations — Working a Question to a Finding

What an investigation is, the two surfaces you run one through, and how a line of analysis becomes a defensible, reproducible finding.

Last updated 2026-06-14

Investigations — Working a Question to a Finding

Reading the operating picture tells you what the platform already decided to show you. An investigation is how you go further: take a question, interrogate the data on your own terms, test your hypotheses against it, and arrive at a finding that's traceable, reproducible, and publishable.

An investigation isn't a separate place so much as a way of working — and it spans two complementary surfaces:

Surface What it's for Where
Investigation Workbench Interrogate fused intelligence as data — slice it, cross-filter it, run tests, record a thread of steps, track hypotheses, and save the whole line of work. Analytics → Workbench
Structured Analysis panel Apply formal analytic techniques — competing hypotheses, key-assumptions checks, indicator matrices, pattern and fusion views. The 🧠 Analysis button in the header

The two work together: the Workbench is where you explore and assemble evidence; the Structured Analysis panel gives you disciplined methods to weigh it. Most investigations use both.

What makes it an "investigation"

Three properties separate an investigation from idle clicking around:

  • It's saved. An investigation captures your data scope, your tile layout, your filters and segments, the thread of steps you took, and the hypotheses you tracked — so you (or a colleague) can reopen it exactly as it was.
  • It's reproducible. Because the scope and steps are recorded, a finding can be re-run and checked rather than taken on trust.
  • It's publishable. A completed investigation can be promoted to a formatted report with its evidence attached — the end product you actually brief from.

The shape of an investigation

A typical line of work:

  1. Frame the question and set a scope (workbench, workspace, date range) in the Workbench.
  2. Explore — load the frame and use tiles (map, timeline, distribution, pivot, charts) to slice the data; cross-filter to narrow toward what matters.
  3. Test — run statistical tests and structured techniques against what you're seeing.
  4. Record — pin the steps that matter to the investigation thread, and capture candidate explanations in the hypothesis register with evidence attached.
  5. Decide — set a verdict on each hypothesis when the evidence is defensible.
  6. Publish — promote the investigation to a report.

Where the detail lives

The mechanics of the Workbench — frames, tiles, cross-filtering, derived fields, filters and segments, statistical tests, the investigation thread, the hypothesis register, and saving/sharing/reporting — are documented in depth in the Investigation Workbench manual. The formal techniques are covered in Structured Analysis.

This article is the orientation; those two are the how-to.

Where to next

← Investigations Open Krataxis ↗